学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

网络聊天礼貌现象的语用学研究

作　者: 刘丽娟
导　师: 霍永寿
学　校: 云南师范大学
专　业: 外国语言学及应用语言学
关键词: 网络聊天礼貌礼貌策略面子
分类号: H030
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2007年
下　载: 42次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

本文采用语用学理论,对网络聊天室中聊天双方使用的礼貌策略进行研究,旨在发现其主要的礼貌策略和它们的语言体现形式。根据Brown和Levinson的面子理论,我们研究分析了88个网络聊天活动中的476个礼貌策略实例,辨别出四种礼貌策略：积极礼貌策略,消极礼貌策略,非公开的礼貌策略和表情符号礼貌策略。研究表明,聊天双方在网络聊天室中最常用的是积极礼貌策略和消极礼貌策略,其次是非公开的礼貌策略和表情符号礼貌策略。最常用的礼貌语言体现形式依次是：模糊限制语,使用小集团身份标志,表情符号,开玩笑,表扬对方以及表达尊重等。此外,详细的分析还表明：因为网络聊天非面对面这一特殊性,聊天双方不能借助身体语言,面部表情以及说话的语调等手段,只能通过键盘打字来表达,更重要的是由于网络互动的即时性要求双方快速传递信息,由此导致了一种新的礼貌策略——表情符号礼貌策略的产生,这也是网络聊天中一种特殊的礼貌策略。本研究同时也表明：网络聊天中礼貌策略的语言实现形式也有其明显特征,如重复汉字或连用标点符号表示吃惊、愤怒等情绪,问号代替繁琐的疑问语句等。我们希望本文的研究能够有助于加深对礼貌策略的了解,认识到礼貌在网络聊天中的作用,有助于聊天双方更好地使用礼貌策略,促进网络聊天文明健康的发展。

全文目录

Acknowledgements  5-6
Curriculum Vitae  6
Major Publications  6-7
摘要  7-8
Abstract  8-13
Chapter one Introduction  13-20
  1.1 Research Orientation  13
  1.2 Research Object  13-14
  1.3 Rationale for the Research  14-15
  1.4 Objectives of the Research  15-16
  1.5 Methodology and Data  16-18
    1.5.1 Research Methodology  16-17
    1.5.2 Data Collection  17-18
  1.6 Outline of the Thesis  18-20
Chapter Two Literature Review  20-33
  2.1 Introduction  20
  2.2 Definition  20-24
    2.2.1 Internet  20-21
    2.2.2 Netspeak  21-23
    2.2.3 Chatroom and Chatting  23-24
  2.3 Approaches to Netspeak  24-31
    2.3.1 The Lexical Approach  25-26
    2.3.2 The Semiotic Approach  26-27
    2.3.3 The Sociolinguistic Approach  27-28
    2.3.4 The Cultural Approach  28
    2.3.5 The Rhetorical Approach  28-29
    2.3.6 The Pragmatic Approach  29-31
  2.4 Summary  31-33
Chapter Three Face Theory:The Theoretical Framework of the Thesis  33-40
  3.1 Introduction  33
  3.2 The Definition  33-35
  3.3 Face-Threatening Acts  35-37
  3.4 Politeness Strategies  37-39
  3.5 Summary  39-40
Chapter Four Realizations of Politeness Strategies in Internet Chatroom Conversations  40-72
  4.1 Introduction  40-41
  4.2 Positive Politeness  41-53
    4.2.1 The Data  41-42
    4.2.2 The Analysis  42-53
      4.2.2.1 Noticing or Attending to H's Wants/Needs  42-43
      4.2.2.2 Exaggerating (interest, approval sympathy with H)  43-44
      4.2.2.3 Using In-group Identity Markers  44-46
      4.2.2.4 Seeking Agreement  46
      4.2.2.5 Avoiding Disagreement  46-48
      4.2.2.6 Presupposing Common Ground  48
      4.2.2.7 Joking  48-49
      4.2.2.8 Asserting or Presupposing S's Knowledge of and Concern for H's Wants  49-50
      4.2.2.9 Offering and Promising  50
      4.2.2.10 Being Optimistic  50-51
      4.2.2.11 Including both S and H in the Activity  51-52
      4.2.2.12 Giving (or Asking for) Reasons  52-53
      4.2.2.13 Giving Gifts to Addressee  53
  4.3 Negative Politeness  53-61
    4.3.1 The Data  54-55
    4.3.2 The Analysis  55-61
      4.3.2.1 Being Conventionally Indirect  55-56
      4.3.2.2 Hedge  56-58
      4.3.2.3 Minimizing the Imposition  58
      4.3.2.4 Giving Deference  58-60
      4.3.2.5 Apologizing  60-61
  4.4 Off Record  61-67
    4.4.1 The Data  61-62
    4.4.2 The Analysis  62-67
      4.4.2.1 Giving Hints  62-63
      4.4.2.2 Understating  63-64
      4.4.2.3 Overstating  64
      4.4.2.4 Using Contradictions  64-65
      4.4.2.5 Being Ironic  65
      4.4.2.6 Being Vague or Ambiguous  65-66
      4.4.2.7 Over-generalizing  66
      4.4.2.8 Being Incomplete by Using Ellipsis  66-67
  4.5 Emoticon  67-69
  4.6 The Frequency of the Politeness Strategies and the Linguistic Means  69-71
  4.7 Summary  71-72
Chapter Five Conclusion  72-78
  5.1 Introduction  72-73
  5.2 Major Findings from the Research  73-76
  5.3 Implications of the Study  76-77
  5.4 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Further Research  77-78
Bibliography  78-84
Appendix  84-104

网络聊天礼貌现象的语用学研究

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文