学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

论预设在侦查讯问中的应用

作　者: 金鑫
导　师: 肖云枢
学　校: 西南政法大学
专　业: 法律翻译理论与实践
关键词: 预设侦查讯问预设触发语词汇层面句法层面
分类号: D918
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2010年
下　载: 74次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

现在,犯罪更为复杂隐蔽,侦查技术又不甚发达,所以侦查人员不太容易在讯问前查清楚所有犯罪事实并搜集到所有犯罪证据。犯罪事实情况只有犯罪嫌疑人自己知道,侦查人员只是在通过侦查手段来再现犯罪嫌疑人过去实施的活动的情况。而犯罪嫌疑人往往抱侥幸心理,希望可以逃避刑罚,所以易于隐藏犯罪事实,对抗讯问。讯问过程往往不那么顺利。证据掌握的不够充分,时间紧,难度大,数量多,侦查人员必须寻找一些讯问技巧,才能提高办案效率。讯问的主要任务是搜集证据和查明犯罪事实。这就要求讯问语言要简练,隐蔽,并富有策略。预设是语用学的研究课题,但是它可以用于侦查讯问中,使讯问语言简练,隐蔽,而富有策略性。把预设理论应用于侦查讯问中,既是必要的,也是可能的。本文旨在探究讯问者如何通过预设在刑事侦查讯问中获取有利信息。在预设理论的基础上,作者试图分析如何将预设运用在侦查讯问中。第一章重点介绍了本文的研究问题,国内法律语言学和国外法律语言学研究现状,以及本文的结构安排。第二章回顾了预设的相关理论,从而为如何通过预设在刑事侦查讯问中获取有利信息提供理论支持。包括预设的定义,研究预设的方法,预设的特征,预设的分类和预设触发语。第三章讨论了刑事侦查,侦查讯问的概念,任务和法律要求,以及讯问语言的特征。然后作者分析了预设理论在侦查讯问中应用的必要性和可能性。第四章从两个层面分析了预设理论在侦查讯问中的应用,并指出了预设理论在侦查讯问中的功能和可能存在的风险。第五章对本文做了总结,提出本研究对语言学和司法实践的意义,本研究的局限性,并对今后的研究提出了一些建议。

全文目录

Acknowledgements  4-5
Abstract  5-7
摘要  7-8
Contents  8-10
Chapter One Introduction  10-16
  1.1 Research questions  11
  1.2 Delimitations of the thesis  11-12
  1.3 Theoretical basis  12
  1.4 Language study in the judicial process  12-14
  1.5 Organization of this thesis  14-16
Chapter Two Literature Review  16-34
  2.1 Definition of presupposition  16-17
  2.2 Two approaches to presupposition  17-18
  2.3 Properties of presupposition  18-21
    2.3.1 Constancy under negation  18
    2.3.2 Being latent  18-19
    2.3.3 Mutual knowledge  19
    2.3.4 Subjectivity  19
    2.3.5 Defeasibility  19-20
    2.3.6 Projection problem  20-21
  2.4 Types of presupposition  21-24
  2.5 Presupposition triggers  24-32
    2.5.1 Definite descriptions  24-25
    2.5.2 Factive verbs  25
    2.5.3 Implicative verbs  25-26
    2.5.4 Change-of-state verbs  26-27
    2.5.5 Iteratives  27
    2.5.6 Verbs of judging  27
    2.5.7 Temporal clauses  27-28
    2.5.8 Cleft sentences  28-29
    2.5.9 Implicit clefts with stressed constituents  29
    2.5.10 Comparisons and contrasts  29
    2.5.11 Non-restrictive relative clauses  29-30
    2.5.12 Questions  30-31
    2.5.13 Counterfactual conditionals  31-32
  2.6 Functions of presupposition  32-34
    2.6.1 For the speaker, it is beneficial to keep conciseness  32-33
    2.6.2 It can help the hearer to get more meaning beyond the actual words  33
    2.6.3 It can increase the persuasive effect  33
    2.6.4 It may make the words humorous so as to reach some effect beyond imagination  33-34
Chapter Three Criminal Investigative Interrogation  34-52
  3.1 Investigation  34-35
  3.2 Investigative Interrogation  35-44
    3.2.1 Concept of investigative interrogation  35-36
    3.2.2 Tasks of investigative interrogation  36-39
    3.2.3 Legal requirements of investigative interrogation  39-44
  3.3 Interrogatory language  44-45
    3.3.1 Introduction to interrogatory language  44
    3.3.2 Features of interrogatory language  44-45
  3.4 The necessity of the application of presupposition in the investigative interrogation  45-47
  3.5 The possibility of the application of the presupposition in the investigative interrogation  47-52
    3.5.1 Investigative interrogation requires concise interrogatory language  47-48
    3.5.2 Investigative interrogation requires hidden interrogatory language  48-50
    3.5.3 Investigative interrogation requires strategic interrogatory language  50-52
Chapter Four Analysis of the application of presupposition in investigative interrogation  52-67
  4.1 Introduction  52-54
  4.2 Presupposition triggers at lexical level  54-60
    4.2.1 Definite description  54-55
    4.2.2 Factive verbs  55-57
    4.2.3 Implicative verbs  57-58
    4.2.4 Change-of-state verbs  58-59
    4.2.5 Iterative  59
    4.2.6 Verbs of judging  59-60
  4.3 Presupposition triggers at the syntactic level  60-65
    4.3.1 Temporal clauses  60-61
    4.3.2 Cleft sentences  61-62
    4.3.3 Implicit clefts with stressed constituents  62
    4.3.4 Comparisons and contrasts  62-63
    4.3.5 Non-restrictive relative clauses  63
    4.3.6 Questions  63-65
    4.3.7 Counter-factual conditionals  65
  4.4 Functions of presupposition in the investigative interrogation  65
  4.5 Risks in using presupposition  65-67
Chapter Five Conclusion  67-71
  5.1 Conclusion  67-69
  5.2 Implications  69-70
  5.3 Limitations of the present study  70
  5.4 Suggestions for further studies  70-71
Bibliography  71-72

论预设在侦查讯问中的应用

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文