学位论文 > 优秀研究生学位论文题录展示

修辞与暴力：“掌掴阎崇年事件”的启示

作　者: 洪春恋
导　师: 刘亚猛
学　校: 福建师范大学
专　业: 英语语言文学
关键词: 修辞权力话语权象征性暴力
分类号: H05
类　型: 硕士论文
年　份: 2010年
下　载: 19次
引　用: 0次
阅　读: 论文下载

内容摘要

在当今全球化和互联网时代,在话语或修辞交流中开发各种修辞资源,在国内、国家间各种争端或冲突,纷繁复杂的信息撷取等等中,善于运用话语或修辞手段并能洞察他人对自己所采用的各种修辞手段,对于消解分歧、达成协议、改变话语资源不对称分布等将是最有效的。这是展开本论文研究写作的重要原因。本文拟从西方修辞学的角度分析“掌掴阎崇年事件”,将此事件视为学术权威和普通观众因话语权不平等而产生的矛盾冲突的一次极端表现。并探究修辞与暴力的关系,修辞手段失效与暴力产生之间存在一定程度上的因果联系或研究修辞实践在减少或避免以暴力解决问题方面能发挥什么作用。现代社会充满了权力话语氛围,通过挖掘此事件背后的意识形态因素,分析事件发生的深层原因。最后阐释我们应该从该事件中获得什么启示。本文从西方修辞的视角理论联系实际,进行描述性、归纳性、演绎性和综合性的论述,尝试就修辞的作用、修辞和权力的关系、修辞和话语权的关系、修辞和暴力的关系等等问题进行初步的探讨和论述。总之,我们希望本文能使人们给予修辞应有的重视,认识到增强修辞和话语批判意识、提高修辞技能的必要性。

全文目录

摘要  2-3
Abstract  3-4
中文文摘  4-8
Introduction  8-10
Chapter One Relevant Concepts:Theoretical Underpinnings  10-28
  1.1 An Overview of Western Rhetoric  10-16
    1.1.1 Defining Rhetoric  10-14
    1.1.2 Rhetoric's Realm of Operation  14-16
  1.2 Social Functions of Rhetoric  16-28
    1.2.1 Rhetoric Tests Ideas  16-17
    1.2.2 Rhetoric Assists Advocacy  17
    1.2.3 Rhetoric Cultivates Efficient Rhetors  17-18
    1.2.4 Rhetoric Cultivates Perceptive and Critical Audience  18-19
    1.2.5 Rhetoric Discovers Facts  19
    1.2.6 Rheto ric Shapes Knowledge  19
    1.2.7 Rhetoric Builds Communities  19-20
    1.2.8 Rhetoric Distributes Power  20-28
Chapter Two Discursive power and Rhetoric  28-34
  2.1 The Relationship between Postmodernism and New Rhetoric  28-29
  2.2 On Discursive Power  29-30
  2.3 Wielding Discursive Power  30-34
    2.3.1 Discursive Power with Discursive Rules as Its Form of Expression  30-31
    2.3.2 Inequity of Discursive Power  31-32
    2.3.3 Two Problems in Exercising Discursive Power  32-34
Chapter Three Rhetoric and Violence  34-40
  3.1 Violence:Where Is It?  34-35
  3.2 Rhetoric or Dialogue as a Means to Avoid Acts of Violence and Its Limitations  35-36
  3.3 Rhetoric as Symbolic Violence  36-40
Chapter Four A Case Study:Rhetorical Analysis of the Slapping Incident InvolvingYan Chongnian  40-50
  4.1 A Brief Introduction of the Incident  40
  4.2 The Reasons Why Yan Chongnian Was Slapped?  40-47
    4.2.1 A Rhetorical Situation:Han Ethnic Chauvinism under the Pretence of AcademicDisputes  41-42
    4.2.2 Irrational Vying for Discursive Power:Inequity of Discursive Power and DiscursiveViolence  42-44
    4.2.3 Academic Studies Affected by Ideology  44-46
    4.2.4 The Responsibility Institutional Power Should Take:the Censorship Practiced byLecture Room  46-47
  4.3 The Lessons Learned from the Incident  47-50
    4.3.1 Respecting Each Other's Discursive Power:Rational Academic Disputes orDiscussion  47-48
    4.3.2 Calling for Independent Academic Research and Criticism  48
    4.3.3 Intensifying the Efforts to Study Rhetorical Discourse and Reinforcing Audiences'Rhetorical and Critical Consciousness  48-50
Conclusion  50-52
References  52-54
攻读学位期间承担的科研任务与主要成果  54-56
Acknowledgements  56-58
个人简历  58

修辞与暴力：“掌掴阎崇年事件”的启示

内容摘要

全文目录

相似论文